Which of the reasons below prevents you from enrolling?
George's ideas may have been important in the 19th century, but
today we're in an information economy, land doesn't really matter, and
besides,
poverty really isn't much of a problem anymore. George described fundamental principles that always apply
as long as people need a place
to live and don't want to work for nothing. Sure, the economy has
changed, but land remains
extremely important. Ask anyone struggling to remain in a gentrifying
neighborhood. Poverty no longer a problem? Worldwide, by any measure,
billions of people remain in poverty. In the U. S., few of us starve
but many of us suffer from high cost of living, low wages, and poor
working conditions. Why should supporting a family require both parents
to have full-time employment? Why should people have to commute an hour
or more from areas with affordable housing to areas with decent jobs?
These thoroughly modern problems are clearly analyzed in our courses.
Progress and Poverty may be great literature, but
it's a big book written in 19th-century style, and I
don't enjoy reading stuff like that. It's too much
work. Then take the modern version of Progress & Poverty. The text has been revised into 21st-century English. Furthermore, you don't
really have to do all the reading. All the important concepts are discussed in class, and our
instructors will never make you feel like a dummy just because you didn't read, or didn't understand, part of the book. And it is great literature.
I'm just not interested in this stuff. Economics is
complicated, and I've got enough complications in
my life already. Economics affects you whether you're interested or not. Do you really want others to do your
thinking for you? Anyhow, it isn't as complicated as you may think, and you might even enjoy the
class.
George's ideas couldn't be very important,
because few people seem to know about them. So you only want to know about things that lots of other people know? Wouldn't you like to try
thinking for yourself? In fact, several Nobel Prize winners, and other prominent economists and
social critics have endorsed George's analysis.
I'm too busy. By the time I've earned a living,
fulfilled my family obligations, taken care of
eating and sleeping, and had a little fun, there's
no time left for learning.Yes, that's a problem for a lot of us. Want to know why? It's covered in our courses.
I'm really much smarter than most people. I
don't need to spend time in a class in order to
learn.Then read Progress and Poverty on your own.
It should be in your local library, at better bookstores, or
order from Robert Schalkenbach Foundation (800/269-9555). After you've finished
it, you might say, "This is interesting. I'd like to discuss it with
somebody, get some of my questions answered, and see how it applies
today." That's what we do in our classes.
Henry George's fundamental idea is simple, and
is described in modern economics texts. I already
know it, so I don't need to read a big book and
spend hours in a classroom to learn it. Henry George's fundamental idea is that, by observing
what happens in the world, maintaining consistent definitions, and
applying common sense, one can determine the basic principles which
explain, among other things, the causes of poverty and periodic
recessions. OurProgress and Poverty course takes you through his reasoning process and equips you to apply it in any situation.
Intrigued? Schedule information is here.
And be sure to bring your doubts. At the end of the course, we review
practical and philosophical objections to George's analysis, and we
don't want to omit yours.
Got another reason that isn't on this list? Tell us about it.
If you want a response, enter your email address: